|
ATS-2A:
Patching 6 versus 12 hours for Severe Amblyopia
PEDIG, Holmes, J. M., Kraker, R. T., Beck, R. W.,
Birch, E. E., Cotter, S. A., et al. (2003). A randomized trial of prescribed
patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology,
110(11), 2075-2087.
OBJECTIVE: To compare full-time patching (all hours or all but 1 hour
per day) to 6 hours of patching per day, as prescribed treatments for
severe amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. DESIGN: Prospective,
randomized multicenter clinical trial (32 sites). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred
seventy-five children younger than 7 years with amblyopia in the range
of 20/100 to 20/400. INTERVENTION: Randomization either to full-time patching
or to 6 hours of patching per day, each combined with at least 1 hour
of near-visual activities during patching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual
acuity in the amblyopic eye after 4 months. RESULTS: Visual acuity in
the amblyopic eye improved a similar amount in both groups. The improvement
in the amblyopic eye acuity from baseline
to 4 months averaged 4.8 lines in the 6-hour group and 4.7 lines in the
full-time group (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Six hours of prescribed
daily patching produces an improvement in visual acuity that is of similar
magnitude to the improvement produced by prescribed full-time patching
in treating severe amblyopia in children 3 to less than 7 years of age.
ATS-2B: Patching 2 versus 6 hours for Moderate
Amblyopia
PEDIG, Repka, M. X., Beck, R. W., Holmes, J. M.,
Birch, E. E., Chandler, D. L., et al. (2003). A randomized trial of patching
regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol,
121(5), 603-611.
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 hours vs 6 hours of daily patching as treatments
for moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. METHODS: In a
randomized multicenter (35 sites) clinical trial, 189 children younger
than 7 years with amblyopia in the range of 20/40 to 20/80 were assigned
to receive either 2 hours or 6 hours of daily patching combined with at
least 1 hour per day of near visual activities during patching.Main Outcome
Measure Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 4 months. RESULTS: Visual
acuity in the amblyopic eye improved a similar amount in both groups.
The improvement in the visual acuity of
the amblyopic eye from baseline to 4 months averaged 2.40 lines in each
group (P =.98). The 4-month visual acuity was at least
20/32 and/or improved from baseline by 3 or more lines in 62% of patients
in each group (P>.99). CONCLUSION: When combined with prescribing 1
hour of near visual activities, 2 hours of daily patching produces an
improvement in visual acuity that is of similar magnitude to the improvement
produced by 6 hours of daily patching in treating moderate amblyopia in
children aged 3 to 7 years.
ATS-2C: Recurrence 2 lines after cease patch or
Atropine
PEDIG, Holmes, J. M., Beck, R. W., Kraker, R. T.,
Astle, W. F., Birch, E. E., et al. (2004). Risk of amblyopia recurrence
after cessation of treatment. J Aapos, 8(5), 420-428.
BACKGROUND: Although amblyopia can be successfully treated with patching
or atropine, there have been few prospective studies of amblyopia recurrence
once treatment is discontinued. METHODS: We enrolled 156 children with
successfully treated anisometropic or strabismic amblyopia (145 completed
follow-up), who were younger than 8 years of age and who received continuous
amblyopia treatment for the previous 3 months (prescribed at least 2 hours
of daily patching or prescribed at least one drop of atropine per week)
and who had improved at least 3 logMAR levels during the period of continuous
treatment. Patients were followed off treatment for 52 weeks to assess
recurrence of amblyopia, defined as a 2 or more logMAR level reduction
of visual acuity from enrollment, confirmed by a second examination. Recurrence
was also considered to have occurred if treatment was restarted because
of a nonreplicated 2 or more logMAR level reduction of visual acuity.
RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 35 (24%) of 145 cases (95% confidence
interval 17% to 32%) and was similar in patients who stopped patching
(25%) and in patients who stopped atropine (21%). In patients treated
with moderately intense patching (6 to 8 hours per day), recurrence was
more common (11 of 26; 42%) when treatment was not reduced prior to cessation
than when treatment was reduced to 2 hours per day prior to cessation
(3 of 22; 14%, odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 18.7). CONCLUSIONS:
Approximately one fourth of successfully
treated amblyopic children experience a recurrence within the first year
off treatment. For patients treated with 6 or more hours
of daily patching, our data suggest that the risk of recurrence is greater
when patching is stopped abruptly rather than when it is reduced to 2
hours per day prior to cessation. A randomized clinical trial of no weaning
versus weaning in successfully-treated amblyopia is warranted to confirm
these observational findings.
|